The uproar in South Africa over the claims that the 1913 Land Act
dispossessed blacks is a blatant lie, and forms part of four core lies
about South African history, a New Observer correspondent Yochanan has
written.
LIE NUMBER ONE:
There is a common belief in South Africa that the Natives Land Act of 1913 shoved blacks on reserves
(‘7 percent of the land’) and
‘prohibited them from buying land in white areas’. That
‘whites
forcibly removed blacks to these reserves and that these reserves were
on the worst land in the country with no mineral riches and that whites
kept all the best land and minerals for themselves’.
Now if I was a black man, I would probably also want to believe that
myth, because it would ensure me eternal victimhood status and
compensation for generations to come.
Unfortunately, it is a blatant lie and can be attributed to
the lack of reading ability or legal comprehension of the journalists
and historians of our time.
above: Black tribal areas, secured, not defined, by the 1913 Land Act
THE TRUTH:
First of all the biggest Platinum reserves in the world run through the
former Black homeland of Bophuthatswana (North West province).
The former Nationalist government had no problem allocating this area
to the Tswana tribes for self-rule—although they already had a massive
country called Botswana given to them by the British. It was originally
part of South Africa, called Bechuanaland.
Blacks further got another two massive countries from the British called Lesotho and Swaziland. There goes their 7 percent.
LIE NUMBER TWO:
‘Black homelands were on the worst land in South Africa’.
THE TRUTH:
When one compares the rainfall map of South Africa and anybody with
elementary knowledge of South Africa will tell you that the largest part
of South Africa is called the Karoo. It is a semi desert comparable to
Arizona or Nevada in the USA.
Blacks never even entered this area let alone settled it. Whites made
it blossom and created successful sheep farms producing meat of world
quality.
Black
“settlements” are found on the north and east coast of
South Africa. The East Coast has a sub-tropical climate and the north a
prairie-like climate with summer rainfall and thunderstorms. An
exception to this is the Western Cape with a Mediterranean climate and
winter rainfall.
The northern and eastern part of South Africa with its beautiful
green grasslands and fertile soil is where the blacks eventually
coalesced and this is the land they chose for themselves. Their eventual
homelands were found on the land they inhabited out of their own free
will.
The Afrikaners even have a song praising the greenness of Natal, called
“Groen is die land van Natal” (Green is the land of Natal). It was perfect grazing area for the cattle herding blacks.
LIE NUMBER THREE:
‘Blacks are indigenous to South Africa and first settled it’.
THE TRUTH:
Today Blacks in South Africa often tell Afrikaners and other minorities
such as the Coloureds, Indians, Chinese or Jews to adapt to their
misrule and corruption or
“Go Home”…implying that we, who have
been born here, who hold legal citizenship through successive
birthrights; should emigrate to Europe, Malaysia, India or Israel. That
the only ones who have a legal claim to South Africa, all of it, are the
blacks. Blacks believe that they are
‘indigenous to South Africa’—but they are not: it was proven by DNA research.
We are ALL settlers in South Africa.
All South Africans are settlers, regardless of their skin colour, and
their DNA carries the proof. So says Dr Wilmot James, head of the
African Genome Project, a distinguished academic, sociologist and, more
recently, honorary professor of human genetics at the University of Cape
Town.
Where is the archaeological proof that blacks
‘settled’ South Africa?
Apart from a few scattered archaeological remains found of black
culture in the far northern Transvaal prior to 1652, it is generally
agreed that blacks and whites were contemporary settlers of South
Africa.
I use the term
“Settler” loosely, because blacks never
‘settled’ South Africa; their presence was nomadic. Blacks were itinerants who travelled from place to place with no fixed home.
Whole capital
“cities” of grass huts could be moved if
grazing was exhausted. They had no demarcated areas, no fences, no
borders, no maps, no title deeds to proof ownership of any land apart
from a verbal claim and mutual understanding that their temporary
presence in a certain area in a certain period of time constituted
“ownership” of the land.
They left behind no foundations of buildings, no statues, no roads, no rock paintings, not a single proof of
“settlement” of the land prior to the whites settling South Africa.
The only rock paintings were made by the Bushmen and the Hottentots
(Khoi-Khoi and San) in the caves they temporarily occupied. Blacks were
pastoral-nomads and the Bushmen/Hottentots were hunter-gatherer-nomads.
Whites, on the other hand, built cities, railroads, dams and a first
world country comparable to the best in Europe and the new world… their
legacy speaks of a people who intended to live there for a thousand
years, if not eternity.
To claim that
‘the whole of Africa belongs to Blacks’ is absurd. It is like an Italian claiming the whole of Europe belongs to Italians, including Norway.
In fact, the pyramids of Egypt are proof of white settlement going
back thousands of years—and also the Phoenicians settling Carthage and
the Greeks settling Alexandria.
The Arabs settled North Africa soon after the Prophet Mohammed died
and the whites settled Southern Africa from 1652 onwards. Today there
are three Africas as Dr. Eschel Rhoodie calls it in his book
“The Third Africa” (1968)… Arabic up north, Black in the centre and Whites at the south…
The white settlers of the Cape first came face to face with the Bantu
around 1770 on the banks of the Great Fish River, 120 years after Van
Riebeeck came to the Cape and 1000 km east of Cape Town.
LIE NUMBER FOUR:
Whites created black reserves and homelands.
THE TRUTH:
Blacks created the homelands themselves, thanks to Shaka Zulu. The common belief is that the
‘black
tribes at the time were all living peacefully and in the spirit of
‘Ubuntu’ with each other in a virtual liberal paradise’.
Nothing could be further from the truth. Shaka-Zulu was a genocidal
maniac who wiped out some two million black people in the Defeqane
( “great scattering”).
above: The Difeqane, or “great scattering” of blacks occurred centuries after Europeans arrived in South Africa
The Zulu tyrant Shaka, at the time was committing genocide against
other tribes. The Swazis and the Ndebeles fled back north in the
direction of central Africa where they migrated from.
The Sothos fled into the mountains of what is today, Lesotho. The
rest of the smaller tribes huddled together trying to find strength in
coalescing.
That is the history of black South Africans that blacks
prefer to ignore… that blacks drove other blacks off their land, not
whites.
It is into this maelstrom of black chaos that the Boers trekked in
1838. As far as they went they found large open sections of country
uninhabited by anyone.
Black tribes fleeing Shaka’s carnage grouped themselves into areas finding protection in concentrated numbers.
This is how Sir Theophilus Shepstone later found the remnants of
black refugees huddled together on self-created reserves. He just
demarcated it in order to protect them from each other.
The creators of the Bantustans were not the Boers or the whites, it was a black man called Shaka.
source:
