The Suidlanders are an emergency plan initiative officially founded in 2006 to prepare a Protestant Christian South African Minority for a coming violent revolution. We are non-aggressive and legal in our preparation. Constituted lawfully under Geneva Convention, with particular reference to Protocols I & II of the Protocols Additional, for the protection of non-combatant civilian Afrikaners (women, children, the elderly and the non-able bodied) in the event of a civil war.
Wednesday, March 29, 2017
White Genocide in South Africa – Simon Roche interviewed VIDEO
In 2006 the signs were becoming clearer that anarchy in South Africa
was a real possibility. While most people ignored these warning signs the Suidlanders started to prepare. Today, many ardent deniers have to admit that anarchy in South Africa is not only possible but likely.
The Suidlanders are an emergency plan initiative officially founded in 2006 to prepare a Protestant Christian South African Minority for a coming violent revolution. We are non-aggressive and legal in our preparation. Constituted lawfully under Geneva Convention, with particular reference to Protocols I & II of the Protocols Additional, for the protection of non-combatant civilian Afrikaners (women, children, the elderly and the non-able bodied) in the event of a civil war.
The
video describes the alarming truth about South Africa. Simon Roach of
Suidlanders, a South African anti Anti-White advocacy group being
interviewed by Mike Cernovich. Simon schools us on the chilling shit
going on down here in South Africa.
Published on South Africa Today
The Suidlanders are an emergency plan initiative officially founded in 2006 to prepare a Protestant Christian South African Minority for a coming violent revolution. We are non-aggressive and legal in our preparation. Constituted lawfully under Geneva Convention, with particular reference to Protocols I & II of the Protocols Additional, for the protection of non-combatant civilian Afrikaners (women, children, the elderly and the non-able bodied) in the event of a civil war.
Zille, tweeting and inanity: more reasons for white South Africans to shut up
It’s remarkable how much of a shitstorm Twitter creates when in the hands of politicians – with serious costs for the rest of us. 
Helen Zille, premier of the Western Cape province and former leader of the opposition Democratic Alliance’s (DA), is – according to her acolytes in the press and most of white South African Facebook followers – irredeemably insightful, strong, lover of truth, seeker after justice, Biko champion and barely a whisker away from being canonised.
Championed by luminaries ranging from ostensible liberals and outright righwingers, how could she possibly go wrong?
Well, by making utterly stupid arguments, for starters. And then going on to defend her own stupidity in a piece of breathtaking solipsism. And tweeting all the way down.
Let’s apply some (very basic) logic to what she actually wrote. What should have been Zille’s starting point (somehow, she ended with this), is one we all recognise: that at the end of colonialism, about to elect a strong man leader for 30 years and throw human rights out the window, Singapore was (in her own words) a
Why not stop there? All that anyone can say for colonialism is that it was barbaric. Zille seems to have an awareness of that fact, and every colonial subject can recognise it.
I presume that Zille would agree that there can never be a defence of one country claiming to own another. The function of colonialism was theft – of resources, labour, rights, freedom, culture, practice, history, bread – everything. It was not a magnanimous sharing of education and culture and sipping tea. It was brutal, violent and murderous.
Bodies – black and brown bodies – were a colonial commodity. Colonies provided the slaves that built much of the vaunted “first world infrastructure” of large swathes of the world. The families of those slaves live with us today. That is already a massive, global psycho-social rent in the social fabric that beneficiaries refuse to recognise. The wealth generated by slave ownership still shapes the power structure of present-day Britain.
Colonial powers have in recent times tried to paint themselves as more or less benevolent – but the truth is that all colonialism is destructive, rapine and hideous. The British populace disagree – over 40% believe Empire was “a good thing”. Old Etonian David Cameron claimed:
Some “bad events” like the slave trade, the murder of indigenous people, combined with theft of the natural resources from millions, the simultaneous impoverishment of millions more, and the destruction of local custom and culture that got in the way of “progress”.
I don’t for a moment assume Zille agrees with this nonsense – so why the fuss? Because she conflates a post-colonial narrative, and of a modernising global economy, with colonialism. Surely even Zille can see that colonialism doesn’t equate with post-colonialism?
I fear not, since her follow-up self-aggrandising piece on “what I learned in Singapore” uses the personal pronoun a remarkable 108 times, suggesting an ego that may do with some of the Buddhism that is the main religion in Singapore. But even with the glaring limitations on human rights in Singapore, surely it is apparent that a post-colonial nation can trade its way to cellphones and microsurgery – it’s not a gift of colonialism, it is how a country manages its affairs after colonialism.
So we hopefully agree – Singapore was stuffed up by colonialism. As was most of Africa and most of Asia. Singaporeans don’t go around lauding colonialism and the gifts it bestowed, and no-one else should either. They talk about what they did after Empire sidled out of the picture. The post-colonial path is what is in fact being discussed.
Zille got it completely wrong, then continued arguing how right she was.
South Africa’s independent judiciary isn’t because of colonialism, which sent black freedom fighters to the gallows. It’s guaranteed by the country’s post-colonial constitution, drawn up in large part by the African National Congress.
The country’s transport infrastructure was a great colonial inheritance – it ensured that white South Africans had buses and trains and tarred roads and traffic lights – and black South Africans had none. Entrepreneurial black South Africans created the minibus taxi industry because blacks felt they may want to go – well, anywhere they wanted – while the authorities felt they only needed to go to work, and then back home.
So, wrong again – South Africa’s post-colonial transport infrastructure created linkages between spatially and racially separate communities, introduced sustainable mass transit systems, the Gautrain, and the rest.
The country’s piped water is a miracle – of post-apartheid delivery.
Yup, that’s colonialism for you. So what did the new South African government do? It made access to clean water a right in the constitution, and since then has connected virtually all urban dwellings to piped water, though rural lags some way behind.
In the examples cited by Zille, not one stands up to her own test.
So when Zille tells black people how stupid they are for electing the corrupt ANC and for not following the Singaporean path, she’s quintessentially white: rights don’t matter, money does. When you’ve always had rights, you don’t value them or understand why others coo about them so much. You can’t eat or trade them, right? Surely you’d rather have a job now, and not waste time on those pesky freedoms? Much rather be arrested for littering the streets of Singapore, secure in the knowledge that your country has modernised at the expense of human rights – the perfect neo-liberal trade-off.
It takes a spectacularly blind set of whites-only glasses to make this argument. And there seems to be a whole horde of white South Africans ready to support her – to agree that all modern technology in the country is the “gift” of the whites, for which blacks should be grateful.
The justification for this argument? The usual – just look at the ANC.
Be clear, dear reader, this article is not a defence of the ANC. It’s a defence of the right of indigenous people to their own freedom, and to use it however they choose – exactly what colonialism denied. Many used those freedoms to vote DA. I wonder if they will think twice next time, knowing that their glorious former leader seems to feel that colonialism was the white man’s burden, and modernity is the white man’s gift.
Why don’t they thank the whites for it?
David Everatt, Head of Wits School of Governance, University of the Witwatersrand
This article was originally published on The Conversation.
Helen Zille, premier of the Western Cape province and former leader of the opposition Democratic Alliance’s (DA), is – according to her acolytes in the press and most of white South African Facebook followers – irredeemably insightful, strong, lover of truth, seeker after justice, Biko champion and barely a whisker away from being canonised.
Championed by luminaries ranging from ostensible liberals and outright righwingers, how could she possibly go wrong?
Well, by making utterly stupid arguments, for starters. And then going on to defend her own stupidity in a piece of breathtaking solipsism. And tweeting all the way down.
For those claiming legacy of colonialism was ONLY negative, think of our
independent judiciary, transport infrastructure, piped water etc. - Helen Zille Tweet
Let’s apply some (very basic) logic to what she actually wrote. What should have been Zille’s starting point (somehow, she ended with this), is one we all recognise: that at the end of colonialism, about to elect a strong man leader for 30 years and throw human rights out the window, Singapore was (in her own words) a
dirt-poor country [with] mass unemployment, lack of education, almost non-existent sanitation, a dearth of natural resources (not even sufficient water), squalid shack settlements prone to major fires, opium addiction, the absence of a sense of nationhood and national pride among people with myriad languages, “races”, cultures, religions.
Why not stop there? All that anyone can say for colonialism is that it was barbaric. Zille seems to have an awareness of that fact, and every colonial subject can recognise it.
Defending the indefensible
I presume that Zille would agree that there can never be a defence of one country claiming to own another. The function of colonialism was theft – of resources, labour, rights, freedom, culture, practice, history, bread – everything. It was not a magnanimous sharing of education and culture and sipping tea. It was brutal, violent and murderous.
Bodies – black and brown bodies – were a colonial commodity. Colonies provided the slaves that built much of the vaunted “first world infrastructure” of large swathes of the world. The families of those slaves live with us today. That is already a massive, global psycho-social rent in the social fabric that beneficiaries refuse to recognise. The wealth generated by slave ownership still shapes the power structure of present-day Britain.
Colonial powers have in recent times tried to paint themselves as more or less benevolent – but the truth is that all colonialism is destructive, rapine and hideous. The British populace disagree – over 40% believe Empire was “a good thing”. Old Etonian David Cameron claimed:
I think there is an enormous amount to be proud of in what the British Empire did and was responsible for. But of course there were bad events as well as good events. The bad events we should learn from and the good events we should celebrate.
Some “bad events” like the slave trade, the murder of indigenous people, combined with theft of the natural resources from millions, the simultaneous impoverishment of millions more, and the destruction of local custom and culture that got in the way of “progress”.
Conflating colonialism with post-colonialism
I don’t for a moment assume Zille agrees with this nonsense – so why the fuss? Because she conflates a post-colonial narrative, and of a modernising global economy, with colonialism. Surely even Zille can see that colonialism doesn’t equate with post-colonialism?
I fear not, since her follow-up self-aggrandising piece on “what I learned in Singapore” uses the personal pronoun a remarkable 108 times, suggesting an ego that may do with some of the Buddhism that is the main religion in Singapore. But even with the glaring limitations on human rights in Singapore, surely it is apparent that a post-colonial nation can trade its way to cellphones and microsurgery – it’s not a gift of colonialism, it is how a country manages its affairs after colonialism.
So we hopefully agree – Singapore was stuffed up by colonialism. As was most of Africa and most of Asia. Singaporeans don’t go around lauding colonialism and the gifts it bestowed, and no-one else should either. They talk about what they did after Empire sidled out of the picture. The post-colonial path is what is in fact being discussed.
Zille got it completely wrong, then continued arguing how right she was.
South Africa’s independent judiciary isn’t because of colonialism, which sent black freedom fighters to the gallows. It’s guaranteed by the country’s post-colonial constitution, drawn up in large part by the African National Congress.
The country’s transport infrastructure was a great colonial inheritance – it ensured that white South Africans had buses and trains and tarred roads and traffic lights – and black South Africans had none. Entrepreneurial black South Africans created the minibus taxi industry because blacks felt they may want to go – well, anywhere they wanted – while the authorities felt they only needed to go to work, and then back home.
So, wrong again – South Africa’s post-colonial transport infrastructure created linkages between spatially and racially separate communities, introduced sustainable mass transit systems, the Gautrain, and the rest.
The country’s piped water is a miracle – of post-apartheid delivery.
(In 1995) only 33% of African households, compared with 72% of coloured, and 97% of both Indian and white ones, have the use of running tap water inside the dwelling for drinking purposes.
Yup, that’s colonialism for you. So what did the new South African government do? It made access to clean water a right in the constitution, and since then has connected virtually all urban dwellings to piped water, though rural lags some way behind.
In the examples cited by Zille, not one stands up to her own test.
Through whites-only glasses
So when Zille tells black people how stupid they are for electing the corrupt ANC and for not following the Singaporean path, she’s quintessentially white: rights don’t matter, money does. When you’ve always had rights, you don’t value them or understand why others coo about them so much. You can’t eat or trade them, right? Surely you’d rather have a job now, and not waste time on those pesky freedoms? Much rather be arrested for littering the streets of Singapore, secure in the knowledge that your country has modernised at the expense of human rights – the perfect neo-liberal trade-off.
It takes a spectacularly blind set of whites-only glasses to make this argument. And there seems to be a whole horde of white South Africans ready to support her – to agree that all modern technology in the country is the “gift” of the whites, for which blacks should be grateful.
The justification for this argument? The usual – just look at the ANC.
Be clear, dear reader, this article is not a defence of the ANC. It’s a defence of the right of indigenous people to their own freedom, and to use it however they choose – exactly what colonialism denied. Many used those freedoms to vote DA. I wonder if they will think twice next time, knowing that their glorious former leader seems to feel that colonialism was the white man’s burden, and modernity is the white man’s gift.
Why don’t they thank the whites for it?
David Everatt, Head of Wits School of Governance, University of the Witwatersrand
This article was originally published on The Conversation.
Monday, March 6, 2017
Bitter Harvest – South Africa
The increasing frustration and bitterness have led to a frightening
upturn in violent assaults on farmers. 2017 has been a horrendous time
for the farming community, with an attack happening almost every day. It
is recorded that 15 people have been savagely murdered in February this
year, making it one of the worst months for farmers.
The video highlights the tragic killing of Bill Voller, a farmer from Tzaneen who was shot in the neck at point-blank range after being stabbed 20 times by five men. Voller was leaving his house to attend to his farming duties when he was confronted by five armed men. The suspects took him back to the house and assaulted him and his wife, Vera (58) and tied her up. After ransacking the house, they took Voller outside, the suspects stabbed him all over his body, including his legs, and shot him. Vera heard the shot and managed to free herself. When she got outside, her husband was already dead, laying next to his vehicle.
One of the suspects wrote a letter regarding the farm killing and delves into the fascinating insight into the psychology of black-African males:
Westerners often aren’t aware of such beliefs. We genuinely believe that by helping poor people uplift themselves we help their communities thrive – and that’s also to our mutual advantage of course: happy neighbors give safer environments for everybody.
Helping your neighbors
It’s the basis of altruistic behavior: helping unhappy neighbors thrive, also makes your own communities safer. Apparently not in the case of poor Mr. Voller. He negotiated a deal with the local municipality and with public sponsors to get water reticulation pipes laid on to two townships in Tzaneen in 1999: these killers, therefore, believed that he must have had at least ‘R5million to R10million..’ that he must be a very rich man.’ As it turned out, Mr. Voller had no money in his homestead. He did have a large supply of legal guns which were robbed: and the gang then didn’t know what to do with: back then with a more alert police force, they couldn’t flog them as easily as they can today. So in the end, Mr. Baloyi apparently turned State’s evidence in exchange for the R50,000 reward offered by the police, from the information I can gather.
Page 1: On the 28th November 1999, I, Freddy Baloyi, was at my workplace at Germiston, the name of the company that I was working for is May-Day Towing, lower Main Reef Road Number 56. Then came Ishamael Mushwana and his younger brother Vincent Mushwana. When they arrived, after exchanging greetings Ishmael introduced Vincent to me and told that he was his younger brother and was coming from Tzaneen.
He’s a tsotsi, he’s rich: he’s been breaking into the Boers’ houses…
‘He’s a tsotsi (a criminal) as you can see how he’s wearing. Even though you are working you cannot work with him. It is long he’s been breaking into the Boers houses, hence you see he’s expensively dressed’. I then nodded with my head. Then from there, Vincent started talking on his own saying there’s a very rich white man near where he’s staying, therefore, there was a job.
This white man has millions of Rands: he is very rich as you can see for yourself: he made it possible for local villages to get tap water…
‘He further said that white man might be having about R10million Rands and not less than R5million Rands. So you Freddy must come with us to rob him so that you can be able to drive your own BMW vehicle just like Ismael. He further said that since I was a Security Guard I am able to use a gun I started asking some questions from Ishmael about whether he knows this rich white man and he confirmed knowing him and that he was very rich. This was further confirmed by the fact that he’d made it possible for the local villagers to get tap water referring to Hallicy (sp?) and Hovheni villages… If we can just go there you can see with your own eyes…’
NOW WATCH THE VIDEO
Source - South Africa Today
The video highlights the tragic killing of Bill Voller, a farmer from Tzaneen who was shot in the neck at point-blank range after being stabbed 20 times by five men. Voller was leaving his house to attend to his farming duties when he was confronted by five armed men. The suspects took him back to the house and assaulted him and his wife, Vera (58) and tied her up. After ransacking the house, they took Voller outside, the suspects stabbed him all over his body, including his legs, and shot him. Vera heard the shot and managed to free herself. When she got outside, her husband was already dead, laying next to his vehicle.
One of the suspects wrote a letter regarding the farm killing and delves into the fascinating insight into the psychology of black-African males:
Westerners often aren’t aware of such beliefs. We genuinely believe that by helping poor people uplift themselves we help their communities thrive – and that’s also to our mutual advantage of course: happy neighbors give safer environments for everybody.
Helping your neighbors
It’s the basis of altruistic behavior: helping unhappy neighbors thrive, also makes your own communities safer. Apparently not in the case of poor Mr. Voller. He negotiated a deal with the local municipality and with public sponsors to get water reticulation pipes laid on to two townships in Tzaneen in 1999: these killers, therefore, believed that he must have had at least ‘R5million to R10million..’ that he must be a very rich man.’ As it turned out, Mr. Voller had no money in his homestead. He did have a large supply of legal guns which were robbed: and the gang then didn’t know what to do with: back then with a more alert police force, they couldn’t flog them as easily as they can today. So in the end, Mr. Baloyi apparently turned State’s evidence in exchange for the R50,000 reward offered by the police, from the information I can gather.
Page 1: On the 28th November 1999, I, Freddy Baloyi, was at my workplace at Germiston, the name of the company that I was working for is May-Day Towing, lower Main Reef Road Number 56. Then came Ishamael Mushwana and his younger brother Vincent Mushwana. When they arrived, after exchanging greetings Ishmael introduced Vincent to me and told that he was his younger brother and was coming from Tzaneen.
He’s a tsotsi, he’s rich: he’s been breaking into the Boers’ houses…
‘He’s a tsotsi (a criminal) as you can see how he’s wearing. Even though you are working you cannot work with him. It is long he’s been breaking into the Boers houses, hence you see he’s expensively dressed’. I then nodded with my head. Then from there, Vincent started talking on his own saying there’s a very rich white man near where he’s staying, therefore, there was a job.
This white man has millions of Rands: he is very rich as you can see for yourself: he made it possible for local villages to get tap water…
‘He further said that white man might be having about R10million Rands and not less than R5million Rands. So you Freddy must come with us to rob him so that you can be able to drive your own BMW vehicle just like Ismael. He further said that since I was a Security Guard I am able to use a gun I started asking some questions from Ishmael about whether he knows this rich white man and he confirmed knowing him and that he was very rich. This was further confirmed by the fact that he’d made it possible for the local villagers to get tap water referring to Hallicy (sp?) and Hovheni villages… If we can just go there you can see with your own eyes…’
NOW WATCH THE VIDEO
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)